The Arab Washingtonian is an independent weekly that seeks to bridge the divide between American citizens and the Arab world by providing news and viewpoints about the region often overlooked by US media. Subscribe to our mailing list
International Pinwheels for Peace Day
Sunday, September 5, 2010
Browse Authors عربي
Italian Design
Around the World
Is the Arab World ready for Democracy?
Dr. Madalla A. Alibeli Dr. Madalla A. Alibeli

As part of his policy to combat terrorism following Al-Qaida attack on 9/11/2001, President Bush vowed to spread democracy, promote freedom, and assist civic institution in the Arab World. Spreading democracy and promoting free and democratic societies were thought to dry the roots of terrorism, to lower the levels of extremism, to alleviate frustration and anger, and to enhance the language of civility, tolerance, and debate rather than hostility, intolerance, and violence.

Unfortunately, President Bush policy stalled due, in part, to the lengthy, expensive, and unexpected war in Iraq. Had the war gone smoothly for the President and had his plans in Iraq run as expected, would he had been able to democratize the Arab World? On other words, is the Arab World ready for democracy?

To begin with, democracy is a political system which provides citizens with regular constitutional opportunities to change the government and replace the governing officials. (Lipset, 1959) It is a social mechanism which permits the majority of the population to influence decisions, decision-making, and decision-makers through free, competitive, and peaceful election.

Since democracy does not exist in a vacuum, then, what are the socioculatural conditions needed for stable, sustained, and representative democracy? First of all, democracy is associated with economic development. World wise, developed countries are more likely to have stable democratic governments than developing or underdeveloped ones. Second, stable democracies usually have systems of checks and balances which keep the state open to criticism and suggestion for improvement. Third, stable democracies are more likely to emerge in heterogeneous societies where people have loyalties to different groups rather than in those very homogeneous societies. Fourth, stable democracies are more likely to exist where the citizens are well informed about the political practices and where people share common values about the legitimacy of the government system. And finally, stable democracies are more likely to develop where economic and social systems are viewed as effective.

Consequently, the social, political, and economic structure in the Arab World is not very receptive or ready for viable and stable democracy. Therefore, honest and sincere efforts are needed to create the environment conducive for democracy rather than democracy itself. Democracy in the Arab World requires more economic development as well as more equality in terms of distributing scarce resources and social rewards. Also, democracy entails higher levels of government accountability, transparency, checks and balances. For democracy to evolve and thrive, civic organization and institutions such as political parties, professional organizations, and social societies need to be encouraged and supported. Moreover, constitutional principles of free expression, free press, and the right to assemble should be implemented as well as minorities rights should be protected and guaranteed.

Election alone neither creates nor sustains democracy. Election in an undemocratic society may lead to an undemocratic government which may worsen the situation and may perpetuate injustice, inequality, and intolerance in society.

(see Arabic translation)
Bookmark and Share

Readers Comments...

Comments 1 to 4 of 4
this is an excellent piece!
2008-06-29 06:06:19
YOU FORGET THE STAKEHOLDERS IN THE CURRENT SOCIETIES. HOW DO WE DEAL WITH THE NOTABLES THAT WILL BE DISENFRANCHISED BY DEMOCRACY? THIS IS WHY THEY RETAIN THEIR GRASP UPON THEIR INHERITED OR STOLEN POWERS.
2007-03-29 18:24:53
Bob
Nice article and glasses dr. Madalla :))))
2007-03-23 20:28:00
I agree with Dr. Alibeli on the issue of economic development. The great people of Jordan and Egypt, for example, have been practicing democracy in many forms for decades now. Their civil societies and social dialogue continue to be present in many facets. Therefore, democracy is not a foreign concept for them. However, without sustainable economic development, citizens’ priorities would remain incapacitated by the constant worry about putting food on the table for their children. With poverty, the dream of strong democracy would elapse. We need to strengthen economies simultaneously with empowering peoples’ and governments’ democratic practices no matter how much we agree with their foreign policies. People in these countries are also responsible for keeping up their good work, and should take pride in every accomplishment they have- high standards of educational and health industries, as one example. This is important because citizens need to know that they previous policies and actions were successful and worth building upon. Thank you Dr. Alibeli.
2007-03-11 07:15:29
Damien
Comments 1 to 4 of 4
 

Comment on this article...

Name:
Email:
Comment*:
Please enter the colored digits:
This helps us avoid malicious scripts
*Comments that are abusive, inflamatory in nature or contribute to violence or hatred will not be published.
 
 

Warning: fopen(/home/arabwash/public_html/cache/hit.txt) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/arabwash/public_html/includes/cache-content-blocks.php on line 120

Warning: flock() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/arabwash/public_html/includes/cache-content-blocks.php on line 122

Warning: fclose(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/arabwash/public_html/includes/cache-content-blocks.php on line 129