Dr. Ghassan Michel Rubeiz
Arab and Jewish Americans should continue to support
Obama despite his apparent limits in capturing all the complexities of their
conflict. He remains sentimentally, culturally, and ideologically fair and
balanced in Middle East politics.
His limitations are not only in his knowledge of facts
about Israel and
Palestine . Attitude
matters too. In trying too hard to prove that he is not biased toward the Arab
cause, he is bound to occasionally stumble in attempts to reassure the Jewish
voter. Last week Obama’s diplomatic lapse at AIPAC (American Israel Public
Affairs Committee) Annual Convention illustrates why an American decisive
statesman is expected to stay neutral in Arab-Israeli affairs.
Soon after the Senator clinched the Democratic presidential
nomination he hurriedly prepared to speak to the annual meeting of the most
influential Jewish lobby. Like the rest of Washington ’s
guest politicians, the senator from Illinois
pledged to the rich and powerful audience his unqualified loyalty to the Jewish
state.
But Obama went too far in comforting and easing doubts.
To demonstrate his loyalty to Israel ,
he declared that Jerusalem
must “remain undivided” as the capital of the Jewish State. This position is at
variance with the current official US
policy, a policy which regards Tel-Aviv, not
Jerusalem , as the capital. Washington
abides by international law on the status of Jerusalem :
the future of the City of Peace
must be negotiated by both Arabs and Jews.
At AIPAC the presumptive Democratic nominee was
perceived to have naively handed Arab East-Jerusalem to
Israel . Later, when confronted with
Arab criticism, Obama swiftly retreated to a more moderate position. Then the
Jewish side was upset by his easy retreat. This incident was a lesson for Obama
to resist improvised diplomacy.
But in the larger scheme of things, Obama’s
Middle East policy is right on track. If elected president,
he may be able to revive the currently stagnated Middle
East peace process. He is open to talks with
Iran , Syria
and their partners; to disciplined withdrawal from
Iraq and to decisive talks on a
two-state solution for the Arab-Israeli conflict.
When it comes to the Middle East, it is unfortunate
that all US politicians are viewed
through a framework of a zero-sum-game: what is good for
Israel is bad for the Arabs and
vice versa. In fact, Obama’s outlook on the Middle East
is refreshingly positive and inclusive. He rightly believes that
Israel ’s
lasting security is in the creation of a viable Palestinian state. Obama seems
to believe that what is good for
Israel is good for Palestinians and
Arabs.
Single issue voters are often discouraged when their
candidate deviates from their passionately held positions. Arab Americans who may
vote for the next president merely through a Palestinian perspective may have
to rethink their ballot.
When an Arab-American voter is upset with Obama for a
statement that is unfair to the Arab cause, that voter needs to keep in mind
that even Black American reformers wish to see Obama more critical of White
America. But these civil rights reformers appreciate the limitations of a
campaign with a national scope. Afro-Americans are mindful that if their
candidate -Obama- invests too deeply in raising civil-rights issues in his
campaign, he will risk becoming too distant from the
America political center.
When a Jewish American voter is upset with Obama for declaring
readiness to talk with Syria ,
Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran
that voter needs to be reminded that
Israel is in fact currently talking
with its adversaries, covertly or indirectly. Jewish Americans who withhold
votes from Obama because of his compassion for Palestinian suffering are not
serving the long-term security needs of
Israel .
Both Arabs and Jews should realize that a McCain White
House would delay peace in the Middle East for
a decade or more. Another Republican term would reinforce a war oriented
conflict between America
and the Muslim world. Extended Bush-based policies starting in 2009 may
deliver the nation into near bankruptcy in the foreseeable future.
In this election year both Arab and Jewish Americans
would be smart to vote as Americans first. This is not to say that home
background issues should be totally overlooked. Obama has the capacity and the
desire to bring peace to the Middle East and offer change to
America If they switch their
mindset to a win-win paradigm Arabs and Jews may find a mutual friend in Obama.
Dr. Ghassan Michel Rubeiz: is a Lebanese-American Middle East analyst and a former professor of social work and psychology.